On appeal, Pring-Wilson argued that all the facts at trial about the fight were accurate, but that his actions were intentional and not negligent. The Court of Appeals disagreed, even though Pring-Wilson intentionally pulled and swung his knife, there was no evidence that he intended to cut or kill Colon. The court reminded us that “[i]ndeed, much negligent conduct involves some intentional act, e.g., driving at an excessive rate of speed, seeHarrison v. Mattapoisett, 78 Mass.App.Ct. 367 (2010)”
Non-court observers might ask, why would it matter if the stabbing was negligent or intentional. The case indicates that Guzman brought the case on a number of theories including an intentional tort, only negligence went to trial. In many cases, the source of funds to pay in personal injury or wrongful death case is the attackers insurance. Insurance often precludes any coverage or liability for the insured’s intentional acts.
Victims of criminal acts have a right to civil recovery as well. Sometimes, the case can be complicated when the attacker has no means to pay themselves. Sometimes homeowners or business insurance can cover the actions that took place. If you or a loved one has been the victim of a criminal action resulting in medical bills, loss of wages, scarring, disability, loss of enjoyment of life, loss of consortium, or pain and suffering you can bring a civil case. Punitive damages may be awarded in some wrongful death cases. If you would like to have a free consultation of your case contact the Law Office of Isaac J. Mass.